| ECCC-3 Contents Page | THEOCHEM Home Page | Elsevier Chemistry Home Page |
Theoretic investigation of azido-group dissociation in aromatic azides.
M.F.Budyka
Institute of Chemical Physics in Chernogolovka, Russian Academy of Sciences,
Chernogolovka, Moscow Region, Russia, 142432. Tel: (095) 524-5006, Fax:
(096) 517-3588,
E-mail: budyka@icp.ac.ru
T.S.Zyubina
Institute of New Chemical Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences,
Chernogolovka, Moscow Region, Russia, 142432. Tel: (095) 524-5024
E-mail: zyubin@incp.ac.ru
Abstract.- MNDO-PM3 level calculations and ab initio calculations at
UHF/6-31G* level were performed for neutral molecules (S0 state),
the lowest excited states (T0 and S1) and radical anions
(D0 and D1 states) of p-nitrophenyl, p-acetylphenyl,
phenyl azides and 4-azidopyridine and HN3. Consideration of the
nature of the frontier molecular orbitals, changes of bond orders, values of
activation barriers shows, that decomposition of azido group facilitates on
excitation of azide into the lowest excited states and on formation of radical
anion.
Keywords: MNDO-PM3, ab initio, aromatic azide, radical anion,
dissociation of azido-group.
The photochemical properties of organic azides have been extensively
investigated [1-5], however there are only the
restricted number of theoretical publications on this subject. The first excites
singlet state S1 and the lowest triplet state T0 are the
most interesting from the point of view of photochemistry, so these states are
examined in the present paper in comparison with the ground state S0.
The electron transfer to azide, as well as an excitation, is known to lead to
decomposition of azido-group [6,7], the radical
anions of azides being the necessary intermediates in these reactions. Therefore
another subjects for discussion in the present paper are the two states of
radical anions - D0 and D1.
The structures of
azides and their radical anions were calculated with full optimization of
geometrical parameters using semi-empirical method MNDO-PM3 [8] (program package MOPAC 7.0). Energy parameters were
improved by ab initio RHF, UHF methods with basis 6-31G*; correlation energy was
calculated using the second and third order of Moller-Plesset perturbation
theory (MP2 and MP3); GAUSSIAN-94 code was used [9].
Excited states were calculated using CIS and CASSCF levels of theory in
GAUSSIAN-94 and EXCITED and C.I. operators in MOPAC 7.0.
Fig.1 shows the
coordinate system used and the structures of aromatic azides investigated:
p-nitrophenyl azide (NPA), p-acetylphenyl azide (APA), 4-azidopyridine (AP),
phenyl azide (PA), and, for comparison, the simplest azide HN3.

Fig.1. Structures of azides investigated and the coordinate system used
Conventionally, we define MO, lying in the plane of aromatic ring, as a sigma-type MO, and that, lying in the perpendicular plane, as a pi-type MO. Fig.2 shows the structures of the frontier MOs: the highest occupied MO (HOMO), the lowest unoccupied MO (LUMO) and the second lowest unoccupied MO (SLUMO) of neutral aromatic azides in the region of azido-group using NPA as an example.

Fig. 2. Frontier orbitals of NPA in the region of azido-group.
In accordance with our definition, HOMO and LUMO are pi-type orbitals, and SLUMO is sigma-type orbital. All three MOs are antibonding on N(2)-N(3) bond, at the same time in the region of N(1)-N(2) bond HOMO is slightly bonding, LUMO is nonbonding, and SLUMO is antibonding.
Fig.3 shows the changes of electron levels of neutral molecules in the series NPA-APA-AP-PA-HN3. In this series electron level of the sigma-type SLUMO changes slightly, but the level of the pi-type LUMO increases, so that in passing from PA to HN3 the change of order of these levels is observed.
Fig. 4 shows the filling of electron levels in different states on the example of APA and its radical anion.One can see that the excited states S1 and T0 are similar to D0 state of radical anion on the nature of the highest singly occupied MOs, that are sigma-type MOs. In S0 and D1 states the highest occupied MOs are pi-types MOs.

Fig. 3.
PM3-calculated changes of electron levels of neutral azides.

Fig. 4. Filling of electron levels in different states of APA and its radical anion (PM3 calculation).
Geometrical parameters are shown in Table 1, and bond orders (Mulliken
density populations) and effective atom charges are shown in Table 2. Example of HN3, PA and NPA
molecules shows that geometrical parameters, calculated by PM3 method are in
good accordance (within 0.02-0.03 A for bond lengths and 1-5° for
valence angles) with more precise ab initio calculations and with experimental
data. From Tabl.2 one can see the same tendency of changes of bond orders,
density populations and charges in azides investigated for both semi- and
non-empirical calculations.
In the neutral azides azido-group has near
linear geometry: valence angle NNN = 169-170° , N(2)-N(3) bond length is
1.12-1.13 A (bond order p23 = 2.48-2.55) , N(1)-N(2) bond
length is 1.26-1.27 A (bond order p12 = 1.33-1.35) for
NPA-APA-AP-PA and 1.25 A (p12 =1.43) for HN3.
Excitation of electron in aryl azides from highest occupied pi-MO to
lowest unoccupied sigma-MO, which is antibonding on N(1)-N(2) bond, results in
lengthening of this bond by 0.07-0.10 A in S1 state. On transition
from S1 to T0 state the further lengthening takes place,
bond order being reduced to p12 =0.88-0.91.
In radical
anions (D0 state) azido-group has trans-bent geometry: valence angle
NNN =130-132°, N(2)-N(3) bond length is 1.16-1.18 A (bond order p23
= 2.19-2.24), N(1)-N(2) bond length is 1.36-1.38 A (bond order p12
= 0.92-0.99) for aryl azides and 1.31 A (p12 =1.20) for HN3.
One can see that on the geometrical parameters D0 state is similar
to S1 state, as a result of similar nature of the singly occupied
MOs (sigma-types MOs).
D1 state differs from D0
mainly by the values of valence angle NNN and bond length r12. For
aryl azides, according to the geometrical parameters, D1 state is
similar to S0 state, as a result of similar nature of the highest
occupied MOs (pi-types MOs).
Thus, analysis of changes of bond orders,
N(1)-N(2) bond lengths, and nature of occupied MOs testifies that removal of N2
molecule from T0, S1 and D0 states will
occur easier than from S0 state.
In all azides under
consideration central nitrogen atom N(2) of azido-group is positively charged,
and terminal atoms N(1) and N(3) are negatively charged.
Calculations show
that in aryl azides about 0.08-0.12 e moves through pi-system from N(1) and N(3)
atoms to benzene ring, that results in alteration of charges on carbon atoms in
the ring. It is noteworthy that quantity of electron density, which moves to
ring through pi-system, decreases in the series NPA-AP-APA-PA.
Heats of formation (total energies), the first singlet vertical excitation
energies and electron affinities of azides are shown in Table 3. Example HN3 and PA shows that
total energies, calculated on RHF/6-31G*//PM3 and RHF/6-31G*//6-31G* levels
differ by 0.0045 and 0.0093 a.u., correspondingly. In all cases PM3 and
HF/6-31G* calculated Ev values are in good agreement with
experimental ones (within 0.14-0.29 eV for PM3 and 0.03-0.08 eV for HF/6-31G*).
The case of NPA is an exception and should be discussed separately.
The
example of HN3 shows, that the electron affinity changes
significantly by going from PM3 semi-empirical calculation to ab initio
RHF/6-31G*//PM3 level, however it changes only slightly during geometry
optimization on the 6-31G* level. By going from RHF to UHF, electron affinity
changes by 0.2 eV. Electron correlation on the MP3(FC)/6-31G*//6-31G* level
results also in a minor (0.2 eV) change of EA value.
For aromatic azides
investigated, RHF/6-31G*//PM3 calculated electron affinities differ from
semi-empirical values less than for HN3 (by 1.7 eV), and by going
from RHF to UHF, changes are the same, as in the case of HN3.
Therefore, calculations on the RHF/6-31G*//PM3 level are sufficient for
revealing the qualitative picture of electron affinity changes in the set of
azides under investigation. Calculation shows that in the series of
NPA-APA-AP-PA-HN3 the electron affinity decreases monotonically
(Fig.5), and, as a result, for the last members of the series the formation of
radical anions becomes thermodynamically unfavorable.

Fig.5. Changes of electron affinities of azides, calculated by different methods.
Fig.6 shows PM3 and HF/6-31G* level calculated minimal energy path of azido group dissociation for S0 T0 and S1 states of HN3.

Fig.6.Minimal energy path of azido group dissociation in the ground (S0) and excited (T0, S1) states of HN3: a) - PM3 calculated; b) calculated at HF/6-31G* level (in accordance with Tab. 3, 4).
Fig.7 shows the relative position of states under discussion and minimal energy paths of azido group dissociation in aryl azides on the example of NPA. Fig.7 demonstrates the principle of calculation of the energy differences (Delta) between different states of azides and radical anions and activation barriers (Ea) for azidogroup dissociation reaction (the value of Ea(S0-T0) was approximately estimated as a cross point of two curves). Calculated Delta values for all discussion states of azides are shown in Table 4 and Ea values in Table 5.

Fig.7.Minimal energy paths of azido group dissociation in the ground (S0) and excited (T0, S1) states and in radical anions (D0 and D1 states) of NPA. The examples of Ea and Delta calculations are shown.
Difference of the heats of formation (or total molecular energies) in S0
and T0 states of HN3 (Delta(S0-T0),
Tabl.4) shows that ROHF/6-31G*//6-31G* and ROHF/6-31G*//PM3 calculated values
are similar and less than PM3 calculated value by 5 kcal/mol. The
MP3(FC)/6-31G*//6-31G* calculated value exceeds PM3 calculated value by 19
kcal/mol.
One can see that values of Delta(S0-T0)
and Delta(S0-S1) change slightly for azides under
investigation and lie in region of 29-33 and 35-38 kcal/mol, respectively. More
significant change is observed for difference Delta(D0-D1),
this value is minimal for NPA (18 kcal/mol) and increases (to 25 kcal/mol) in
the series NPA-APA-AP.
From Fig.6 one can see, that the semi-empirical and
ab initio methods give the qualitatively similar picture of the HN3
dissociation process. PM3 calculated activation barrier Ea(S0)
coincides with experimental values (52 and 53.6 kcal/mol, respectively, Tabl.5).
RHF/6-31G*//6-31G* and RHF/6-31G*//PM3 calculated values of Ea(S0)
are similar and less than PM3 calculated value by 25 kcal/mol, correlation
correction makes up 21 kcal/mol.
The value of Ea(S0-T0)
was estimated as difference of total energies (S0) of the system at
minimal point and at N(1)-N(2) bond length when the total energies in S0
and T0 states coincide (Fig.7). PM3 calculated activation barrier Ea(S0-T0)
agrees with experimental values (32 and 36.2 kcal/mol, respectively, Tabl.5).
RHF/6-31G*//6-31G* calculated value is equal to 25 kcal/mol, correlation
correction increases this value by 10 kcal/mol.
For excited states (T0,
S1) PM3-and ab initio calculated activation barriers differ within
2-5 kcal/mol.
Taking into account the above corrections, PM3 method can be
used for qualitative estimation of relative reactivity of aromatic azides in
different states.
For all azides under consideration activation barrier,
both semi- and non-empirical calculated (Fig.6, Fig.7, Tabl.5) is the highest
for S0 state and is comparatively small for excited states (T0,
S1) and for radical anion (D0 and D1
states).
Comparison of Ea values for different azides in
different states (Tab.5) shows that the value of activation barrier for every
state of azides does not practically depend on the nature of azide and is mainly
determined by the nature of azide state.
Thus, the calculations show, that decomposition of azido group facilitates on excitation of azide into the lowest excited states (T0 or S1) and on formation of radical anion (D0 or D1 state). This conclusion is in full accordance with the known experimental results [1-7].
The work is financially supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research (Grant 94-03-08673). Part of ab initio calculations were carried out at the Supercomputer Center (IOC RAS) in connection with RFBR grant 95-07-20201.
Table 1. Geometry of XNNN fragment
(X = H, C) in aryl azides and in HN3.
Return to text
| Molecule | State | rX-N(1), A | rN(1)-N(2), A | rN(2)-N(3), A | Angle NNN, deg | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HN3 | S0 | 1.00 1.02 1.01 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 1.02 |
1.25 1.28 1.24 1.24 1.24 1.25 1.24 1.24 |
1.13 1.11 1.10 1.13 1.13 1.16 1.13 1.13 |
169.8 171.1 173.8 171.3 171.3 171.1 171.3 171.3 |
PM3 RHF/3-21G RHF/6-31G* MCSCF/Huza) CASSCF(14,10)/Huza) MP2(FC)/6-31G* MCSCF+SDCI/Huza) exp.b) |
| T0 | 0.99 1.01 |
1.38 1.39 |
1.16 1.17 |
127.6 117.9 |
PM3 ROHF/6-31G* | |
| S1 | 0.99 | 1.37 | 1.16 | 129.8 | PM3 | |
| HN3- | D0 | 1.00 1.03 1.01 1.03 |
1.31 1.40 1.32 1.36 |
1.18 1.21 1.21 1.18 |
132.4 123.5 123.8 133.6 |
PM3 ROHF/3-21G ROHF/6-31G* MP2(FC)/6-31G* |
| D1 | 1.00 | 1.34 | 1.17 | 173.3 | PM3 | |
| PA | S0 | 1.44 1.42 |
1.26 1.23 |
1.13 1.10 |
169.6 174.6 |
PM3 RHF/6-31G* |
| T0 | 1.36 | 1.40 | 1.16 | 127.5 | PM3 | |
| S1 | 1.40 | 1.34 | 1.16 | 135.8 | PM3 | |
| PA- | D0 | 1.38 | 1.36 | 1.17 | 130.4 | PM3 |
| AP | S0 | 1.43 | 1.27 | 1.13 | 169.4 | PM3 |
| T0 | 1.37 | 1.39 | 1.16 | 127.3 | PM3 | |
| S1 | 1.41 | 1.37 | 1.16 | 134.0 | PM3 | |
| AP- | D0 | 1.37 | 1.37 | 1.17 | 130.2 | PM3 |
| D1 | 1.38 | 1.30 | 1.16 | 170.1 | PM3 | |
| APA | S0 | 1.43 | 1.27 | 1.13 | 169.3 | PM3 |
| T0 | 1.36 | 1.40 | 1.16 | 127.5 | PM3 | |
| S1 | 1.40 | 1.34 | 1.15 | 135.0 | PM3 | |
| APA- | D0 | 1.37 | 1.37 | 1.17 | 129.9 | PM3 |
| D1 | 1.42 | 1.25 | 1.15 | 169.0 | PM3 | |
| NPA | S0 | 1.42 1.417 |
1.27 1.270 |
1.13 1.127 |
169.2 173.4 |
PM3 exp.c) |
| T0 | 1.36 | 1.40 | 1.16 | 127.3 | PM3 | |
| S1 | 1.40 | 1.35 | 1.16 | 133.5 | PM3 | |
| NPA- | D0 | 1.35 | 1.38 | 1.16 | 129.6 | PM3 |
| D1 | 1.43 | 1.25 | 1.14 | 169.1 | PM3 |
a) calculated using Huzinaga basis (10s6p1d)N,
(6s2p)H [10]
b) see [11]
c) crystallographic data [12]
Table 2. Bond orders (PM3 calculated), Mulliken
density populations (RHF/6-31G* calculated) and effective atom charges in XNNN
fragment (X = H, C) in aryl azides and HN3.
Return to text
| Molecule | State | pX-N(1) | pN(1)-N(2) | pN(2)-N(3) | qX | qN(1) | qN(2) | qN(3) | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HN3 | S0 | 0.93 0.62 0.62 |
1.43 0.60 0.58 |
2.48 1.22 1.32 |
0.13 0.39 0.38 |
-0.47 -0.57 -0.57 |
0.72 0.35 0.39 |
-0.37 -0.17 -0.20 |
PM3 RHF/6-31G*//PM3 RHF/6-31G*//6-31G* |
| T0 | 1.04 0.56 0.56 |
1.12 0.27 0.27 |
2.24 0.76 0.76 |
0.09 0.38 0.37 |
-0.06 -0.31 -0.29 |
0.14 -0.03 -0.05 |
-0.17 -0.05 -0.03 |
PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//6-31G* | |
| S1 | 1.04 | 1.14 | 2.27 | 0.09 | -0.09 | 0.16 | -0.16 | PM3 | |
| HN3- | D0 | 1.00 0.57 |
1.20 0.49 |
2.06 0.76 |
0.02 0.23 |
-0.64 -0.75 |
0.26 -0.05 |
-0.64 -0.43 |
PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//PM3 |
| D1 | 0.96 | 1.05 | 2.05 | 0.03 | -0.63 | 0.25 | -0.66 | PM3 | |
| PA | S0 | 1.01 0.61 0.62 |
1.37 0.42 0.48 |
2.51 1.23 1.11 |
0.04 0.27 0.27 |
-0.42 -0.52 -0.51 |
0.73 0.39 0.44 |
-0.34 -0.16 -0.20 |
PM3 RHF/6-31G*//PM3 RHF/6-31G*//6-31G* |
| T0 | 1.48 | 0.91 | 2.30 | 0.01 | -0.14 | 0.16 | -0.21 | PM3 | |
| S1 | 1.35 | 1.05 | 2.29 | -0.01 | -0.17 | 0.24 | -0.19 | PM3 | |
| PA- | D0 | 1.28 0.87 |
0.99 0.36 |
2.19 0.85 |
0.14 0.33 |
-0.48 -0.61 |
0.26 -0.02 |
-0.49 -0.29 |
PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//PM3 |
| AP | S0 | 1.02 0.64 |
1.35 0.40 |
2.53 1.25 |
0.07 0.33 |
-0.42 -0.52 |
0.73 0.39 |
-0.32 -0.14 |
PM3 RHF/6-31G*//PM3 |
| T0 | 1.40 | 0.91 | 2.23 | 0.01 | -0.10 | 0.16 | -0.19 | PM3 | |
| S1 | 1.35 | 0.98 | 2.26 | 0.01 | -0.11 | 0.19 | -0.20 | PM3 | |
| AP- | D0 | 1.33 0.91 |
0.97 0.34 |
2.21 0.86 |
0.17 0.38 |
-0.46 -0.60 |
0.25 -0.02 |
-0.47 -0.27 |
PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//PM3 |
| D1 | 1.22 | 1.28 | 2.20 | -0.07 | -0.31 | 0.44 | -0.53 | PM3 | |
| APA | S0 | 1.02 0.63 |
1.35 0.40 |
2.53 1.24 |
0.07 0.29 |
-0.42 -0.52 |
0.73 0.39 |
-0.32 -0.14 |
PM3 RHF/6-31G*//PM3 |
| T0 | 1.48 | 0.88 | 2.25 | 0.02 | -0.12 | 0.16 | -0.20 | PM3 | |
| S1 | 1.38 | 1.00 | 2.24 | 0.01 | -0.13 | 0.20 | -0.22 | PM3 | |
| APA- | D0 | 1.37 0.90 |
0.95 0.28 |
2.22 0.85 |
0.17 0.34 |
-0.44 -0.59 |
0.24 -0.04 |
-0.45 -0.23 |
PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//PM3 |
| D1 | 1.07 | 1.45 | 2.27 | -0.15 | -0.33 | 0.62 | -0.55 | PM3 | |
| NPA | S0 | 1.04 0.64 |
1.33 0.40 |
2.55 1.25 |
0.10 0.31 |
-0.42 -0.52 |
0.72 0.39 |
-0.30 -0.12 |
PM3 RHF/6-31G*//PM3 |
| T0 | 1.47 | 0.89 | 2.25 | 0.02 | -0.09 | 0.15 | -0.17 | PM3 | |
| S1 | 1.38 | 0.98 | 2.22 | 0.02 | -0.09 | 0.18 | -0.20 | PM3 | |
| NPA- | D0 | 1.46 0.93 |
0.92 0.26 |
2.24 0.85 |
0.19 0.35 |
-0.40 -0.57 |
0.23 -0.04 |
-0.41 -0.20 |
PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//PM3 |
| D1 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 2.31 | -0.14 | -0.34 | 0.64 | -0.50 | PM3 |
Table 3. Heats of formation (Hf)
and total energies (E) of aryl azides and HN3 (S0 state)
and their radical anions (D0 state), the first singlet vertical
excitation energies (Ev) and electron affinities (EA) .
Return to text
| Molecule | State | Hf,kcal/mol E, a.u. |
Ev, eV (exp)a | EA, eV | Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HN3 | S0 | 75.3 -162.8764 -163.8338 -163.8387 -163.8387 -164.3322 -164.3411 -164.3215 |
(4.70) 4.78 |
1.02 -1.07 -0.99 -1.03 -0.79 -1.78 -1.67 -1.22 |
PM3 RHF/3-21G//3-21G RHF/6-31G*//PM3 RHF/6-31G*//6-31G* UHF/6-31G*//6-31G* MP2(FC)/6-31G*//6-31G* MP2(FC)//6-31G*//MP2/6-31G* MP3(FC)/6-31G*//6-31G* |
| HN3- | D0 | 51.8 -162.8372 -163.7974 -163.8008 -163.8096 -164.2666 -164.2798 -164.2766 |
PM3 ROHF/3-21G//3-21G ROHF/6-31G*//PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//6-31G* UHF/6-31G*//6-31G* MP2(FC)/6-31G*//6-31G* UMP2(FC)/6-31G*// UMP2(FC)/6-31G* UMP3(FC)/6-31G*//6-31G* | ||
| PA | S0 | 100.7 -393.3769 -393.3862 |
4.64 (4.35) 4.38 |
1.79 -0.02 |
PM3 RHF/6-31G*//PM3 RHF/6-31G*//6-31G* |
| PA- | D0 | 59.4 -393.3761 |
PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//PM3 | ||
| AP | S0 | 107.6 -409.3674 |
4.73 (4.59) 4.56 |
2.09 0.44 |
PM3 RHF/6-31G*//PM3 |
| AP- | D0 | 59.4 -409.3835 |
PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//PM3 | ||
| APA | S0 | 59.4 -545.1486 -545.1486 |
4.57 (4.43) 4.48 |
2.15 0.51 0.75 |
PM3 RHF/6-31G*//PM3 UHF/6-31G*//PM3 |
| APA- | D0 | 9.8 -545.1673 -545.1761 |
PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//PM3 UHF/6-31G*//PM3 | ||
| NPA | S0 | 91.7 -596.8427 -596.8427 |
4.51(3.94) 4.43 |
2.64 0.95 1.20 |
PM3 RHF/6-31G*//PM3 UHF/6-31G*//PM3 |
| NPA- | D0 | 30.7 -596.8778 -596.8869 |
PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//PM3 UHF/6-31G*//PM3 |
a) experimental values are given in parenthesis
Table 4. Calculated energy differences
(Delta) between different states of azides and radical anions (definition see
Fig.7).
Return to text
| Molecule | State | Delta, kcal/mol | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| HN3 | S0-T0 | 31 | PM3 |
| 26 26 |
ROHF/6-31G*//PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//6-31G* | ||
| 50 | MP3(FC)/6-31G*//6-31G* | ||
| S0-S1 | 37 | PM3 | |
| 66 | CIS/6-31G*//6-31G* | ||
| HN3- | D0-D1 | 21 | PM3 |
| 51 | CIS/6-31G*//6-31G* | ||
| PA | S0-T0 | 29 | PM3 |
| S0-S1 | 35 | PM3 | |
| PA- | D0-D1 | (22)a | PM3 |
| AP | S0-T0 | 32 | PM3 |
| S0-S1 | 36 | PM3 | |
| AP- | D0-D1 | 25 | PM3 |
| APA | S0-T0 | 31 | PM3 |
| S0-S1 | 36 | PM3 | |
| APA- | D0-D1 | 22 | PM3 |
| NPA | S0-T0 | 33 | PM3 |
| S0-S1 | 38 | PM3 | |
| NPA- | D0-D1 | 18 | PM3 |
a) estimated value
Table 5. Calculated activation energy (Ea)
of azido group dissociation reaction in different states of azides and their
radical anions (definition see Fig.7).
Return to text
| Molecule | State | Ea, kcal/mol | Method |
|---|---|---|---|
| HN3 | S0 | 52 27 27 22 39 48 53.6 |
PM3 RHF/6-31G*//PM3 RHF/6-31G*//6-31G* CASSCF(4,4)/6-31G*//6-31G* CASSCF(8,8)/6-31G*//6-31G* MP3(FC)/6-31G*//6-31G* exp.a) |
| S0-T0 | 32 25 39 35 36.2 |
PM3 RHF/6-31G*//6-31G* CASSCF(14,10)/Huzb) MCSCF+SDCI/Huzb) exp.a) | |
| T0 | 2 7 2 1 2 |
PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//6-31G* UHF/6-31G*//6-31G* PUHF/6-31G*//6-31G* MP3(FC)/6-31G*//6-31G* | |
| S1 | 8 10 |
PM3 CIS/6-31G*//6-31G* | |
| HN3- | D0 | 37 19 13 11 14 12 14 |
PM3 ROHF/6-31G*//6-31G* UHF/6-31G*//6-31G* PUHF/6-31G*//6-31G* MP2(FC)/6-31G*//6-31G* PMP2(FC)/6-31G*//6-31G* MP3(FC)/6-31G*//6-31G* |
| D1 | 17 5 |
PM3 CIS/6-31G*//6-31G* | |
| PA | S0 | 35 | PM3 |
| T0 | 2 | PM3 | |
| S0-T0 | 27 | PM3 | |
| S1 | 19 | PM3 | |
| PA- | D0 | (10)c) | PM3 |
| AP | S0 | 40 | PM3 |
| T0 | 2 | PM3 | |
| S0-T0 | 27 | PM3 | |
| S1 | 16 | PM3 | |
| AP- | D0 | 8 | PM3 |
| APA | S0 | 36 | PM3 |
| T0 | 2 | PM3 | |
| S0-T0 | 27 | PM3 | |
| S1 | 18 | PM3 | |
| APA- | D0 | 7 | PM3 |
| NPA | S0 | 39 | PM3 |
| T0 | 2 | PM3 | |
| S0-T0 | 28 | PM3 | |
| S1 | 18 | PM3 | |
| NPA- | D0 | 6 | PM3 |
| D1 | 14 | PM3 |
a) see [13]
b) calculated using Huzinaga basis (10s6p1d)N, (6s2p)H
[10]
c) estimated value