Glutathione S-transferase genotypes and cancer risk
Fritz F. Parl
Department of Pathology and Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center,
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
Correspondence to: Department of Pathology, TVC 4918, Vanderbilt University Medical
Center, Nashville, TN 37232; Phone (615) 343-9117; Fax (615) 343-9563; e-mail fritz.parl@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
Over 500 studies have examined the association of genetic variants of glutathione
S-transferases with various malignancies yielding inconsistent results. The genotyping
was based on PCR assays that identified the GSTM1 and GSTT1 null (-/-) genotypes
but did not distinguish homozygous wild-type +/+ and heterozygous +/- individuals.
Complete GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotyping can be accomplished by recently developed assays
(Cancer Res 2004; 64:1233-1236; Pharmacogenetics 2000; 10:557-565) that allow the
definition of +/+, +/-, and -/- genotypes by separate identification of the respective
GSTM1 and GSTT1 wild-type and null alleles. Application of the new GSTM1 assay to
a breast cancer case-control study revealed that the relative risk of breast cancer
for the +/+ genotype compared to the -/- genotype was 2.83 (95% confidence interval
1.45 - 5.59; P = 0.002), suggesting a protective effect of the GSTM1 deletion (Cancer
Res 2004; 64:1233-1236). Regardless of the explanation for the association between
the +/+ genotype and increased breast cancer risk, these results warrant application
of true GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotyping to additional or previously analyzed groups with
breast cancer or other malignancies.
Abbreviations: GSTM1, glutathione S-transferase M1; GSTT1, glutathione
S-transferase T1
Keywords: genotype, molecular epidemiology, cancer, enzyme conjugation
1. Introduction
Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) constitute a superfamily of ubiquitous, multifunctional
enzymes, which play a key role in cellular detoxification, protecting macromolecules
from attack by reactive electrophiles [1]. The GSTs catalyze the conjugation of
the tripeptide glutathione (GSH) to a wide variety of exogenous and endogenous chemicals
with electrophilic functional groups (e.g., products of oxidative stress, environmental
pollutants, and carcinogens), thereby neutralizing their electrophilic sites, and
rendering the products more water-soluble [2]. Based on sequence homology and immunological
crossreactivity, human cytosolic GSTs have been grouped into seven families, designated
GST Alpha, Mu, Pi, Sigma, Omega, Theta, and Zeta [3-5]. The GSTs have presumably
arisen from a single common ancestor and their substrate specificity and diversity
have been reshaped by gene duplication, gene recombination, and an accumulation of
mutations. In view of the importance of GSTs in cellular detoxification of carcinogens,
genetic variants of GSTs have attracted the attention of epidemiologists with respect
to cancer risk. A search of the literature up to April 2004 listed more than 500
studies of GST genotypes in relation to breast, lung, colon, brain, and various other
types of cancer [6-8]. Since GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTT1 have been the most commonly
examined genes I will briefly review the GSTmu, pi, and theta families. I will also review
the genotyping of GST variants, which has been definitive for single-nucleotide polymorphisms
of the GSTP1 gene, but inadequate for GSTM1 and GSTT1 variants.
2. GSTmu
The GSTmu subfamily is encoded by a 100-kb gene cluster at 1p13.3 arranged as
5'-GSTM4-GSTM2-GSTM1-GSTM5-GSTM3-3' [9,10] (Fig. 1). Deletion of the GSTM1 gene,
GSTM1*0, frequently affects both alleles, resulting in the so-called -/- genotype,
GSTM1-/-. A meta-analysis of 30 studies [11] involving over 10,000 individuals identified
the GSTM1 null genotype in 53% Caucasians (with a 42 to 62% range for individual
studies). The frequency of the GSTM1-/- genotype was similar in Asians but lower
in African-Americans, 27% (16 - 36%). Detailed mapping of the GSTmu gene cluster
revealed that the GSTM1 gene is flanked by two almost identical 4.2-kb regions (Fig.
1). The GSTM1*0 deletion is caused by a homologous recombination involving the left
and right 4.2-kb repeats [10]. Analysis of 20 GSTM1*0 alleles from 13 unrelated
individuals showed the same recombination pattern, which results in a 16-kb deletion
containing the entire GSTM1 gene. The GSTM1 gene is excised relatively precisely
leaving the adjacent GSTM2 and GSTM5 genes intact. Therefore, one can rule out recombination
with neighboring GSTM genes as a possible mechanism for the GSTM1*0 deletion, despite
extensive homologies in certain regions. A missense single nucleotide polymorphism
also occurs in the GSTM1 gene, i.e., nucleotide 534 G -> C (172 Lys -> Asn, corresponding
to GSTM1*A and GSTM1*B, espectively), which does not appear to affect the enzyme
function [12]. Analysis of the other GSTM isoforms shows extensive homologies.
For example, exon 8 of the GSTM2 gene and exon 8 of the GSTM1 gene are more than
99% identical over 583 nucleotides [13]. The GSTM3 gene is considerably shorter than
the other GSTM isoforms and oriented tail-to-tail in the cluster [14] (Fig. 1).
In the GSTM3 gene, the GSTM3*A wild type and GSTM3*B variant alleles differ from
each other by a deletion of three bp in intron 6, resulting in the generation of
a recognition sequence for the YY1 transcription factor in the latter [15]. A linkage
disequilibrium has been noted between the GSTM1*A and GSTM3*B alleles [15]. GSTM4
shares amino acid sequence identity with GSTM1 (87%), GSTM2 (83%) and GSTM3 (70%)
[16].
Figure 1.
The GSTM1 gene is part of the Mu-class GST gene cluster at 1p13.3, which is arranged as 5'-GSTM4-GSTM2-GSTM1-GSTM5-GSTM3-3'
(top of diagram). The GSTM1 gene (black box) consists of 8 exons, which range in size from 36 to 112 bp, while the introns vary from 87 to 2,641 bp. GSTM1 is embedded in a region with extensive homologies and flanked by two almost identical 4.2-kb regions (gray boxes). The GSTM1 null allele arises by homologous recombination of the left and right 4.2-kb repeats, which results in a 16-kb deletion containing the entire GSTM1 gene (bottom of diagram). The point of deletion cannot be precisely localized because of the high sequence identity between the repeats.
Numerous studies have analyzed the GSTM1 genotype using a PCR-based assay designed
to identify the wild-type allele of GSTM1 [17]. In this assay, the absence of a
PCR product (273 bp) indicates the GSTM1 -/- genotype and study participants were
categorized as either wild-type or null 'genotypes'. This analytical approach has
one basic flaw in that it does not positively identify the null allele and, therefore,
cannot distinguish homozygous wild-type +/+ from heterozygous +/- individuals. We
analyzed the GSTM gene cluster and recently developed a long-range PCR assay (14
kb product) to allow positive identification of the null allele. In combination
with the identification of the wild-type allele, we could perform true GSTM1 genotyping
and define the +/+, +/-, and -/- genotypes. Thus, we could determine the frequency
of the GSTM1 wild-type and null alleles in the Caucasian and African-American populations.
We found that the GSTM1 wild-type allele is nearly twice as common in African-American
(0.407) than in Caucasian (0.225) women [18].
3. GSTpi
The single GSTP1 gene at 11q13 is 2.8 kb long and contains seven exons [19-21]
(Fig. 2). The open reading frame starts at the 3' end of the first exon and is 630
bp long, encoding a protein of 209 amino acids (most authors exclude the initiator
methionine). GSTP1 is expressed in many tissues including breast where it is the
predominant GST [22]. A CpG island in the GSTP1 promoter was shown to be unmethylated
in normal breast but hypermethylated in approximately one third of primary breast
cancers [23,24]. In these tumors, the hypermethylation was associated with loss
of GSTP1 expression as demonstrated by immunohistochemistry. Several single nucleotide
polymorphisms have been described in the GSTP1 gene. Two of the polymorphisms result
in amino acid substitutions in codons 104 (Ile -> Val) and 113 (Ala -> Val) in exons
5 and 6, respectively [25] (Fig. 2). Both amino acids 104 and 113 affect substrate
specificity to the point of distinguishing between planar and nonplanar substrates
[26,27].
Figure 2.
Overview of GSTP1 gene, mRNA, and protein. The GSTP1 gene at 11q13 is about 2.8 kb long and contains seven exons.
The open reading frame starts at the 3' end of the first exon and is 630 bp long, encoding a protein of 209 amino acids
with a relative molecular weight Mr 23,224. The arrows indicate polymorphic sites. Two of the polymorphisms
result in amino acid substitutions in codons 104 (Ile -> Val) and 113 (Ala -> Val) in exons 5 and 6, respectively.
4. GSTtheta
The GSTtheta subfamily consists of two genes, GSTT1 and GSTT2, which are located
at 22q11.2 and separated by about 50 kb [8,28,29] (Fig. 3). Both genes have five
exons with identical intron/exon boundaries but share only 55% amino acid identity.
About 20% of Caucasians are homozygous for a GSTT1 null allele, GSTT1*0. The GSTT1
-/- genotype is more common in Asians, with frequencies ranging from 47 to 64% [11,30].
The deletion of the GSTT1 gene does not include GSTT2 [28]. Analysis of a 119-kb
section containing the GSTT1 and GSTT2 genes revealed extensive homologies, e.g.,
two 18 kb regions, HA3 and HA5, with >90% homology flanking GSTT1. HA3 and HA5 contained
two identical 403-bp repeats, which were identified as deletion/junction regions
of the GSTT1 null allele [31]. Similar to GSTM1*0, the GSTT1*0 deletion is most
likely caused by a homologous recombination event involving the left and right 403-bp
repeats. The recombination results in a ~54-kb deletion containing the entire GSTT1
gene (Fig. 3). Determination of GSTT1 enzyme activity in erythrocytes showed a trimodal
phenotypic distribution corresponding to the +/+, +/-, and -/- genotypes [31].
Figure 3.
The GSTT1 gene is part of the Theta-class GST gene cluster at 22q11.2
(top of diagram). GSTT1 and GSTT2 are separated by approximately 50 kb. GSTT2 lies
head-to-head with a gene encoding the D-dopachrome tautomerase (DDCT). The GSTT2
and DDCT genes have been duplicated in an inverted repeat. The duplicated GSTT2
is a pseudogene (named GSTT2P) because an abnormal exon2/intron 2 splice site causes
a premature translation stop. The GSTT1 gene (black box) consists of five exons,
which range in size from 88 to 195 bp, while the introns vary from 205 to 2,363 bp.
The GSTT1 gene is embedded in a region with extensive homologies and flanked by
two 18 kb regions, HA3 and HA5 (gray boxes), which are more than 90% homologous.
In their central portions HA3 and HA5 share a 403-bp sequence with 100% identity.
The GSTT1 null allele arises by homologous recombination of the left and right 403-bp
repeats, which results in a 54-kb deletion containing the entire GSTT1 gene (bottom
of diagram). The point of deletion cannot be precisely localized because of the
sequence identity between the 403-bp repeats.
Similar to GSTM1, numerous studies of the GSTT1 genotype employed a PCR-based
assay that identified the wild-type allele [32]. The absence of a PCR product signified
the GSTT1 -/- genotype. However, this assay did not positively identify the null
allele and therefore could not distinguish homozygous +/+ from heterozygous +/- individuals.
Sprenger et al. [31] performed an analysis of the GSTT gene cluster and designed
a PCR assay for the positive identification of the null allele. They further developed
a multiplex PCR for the coamplification of both wild-type and null alleles, permitting
GSTT1 genotyping in a single assay. In Caucasian men the frequencies of the wild-type
and null alleles were 0.57 and 0.43, respectively.
5. GST Genotypes and Cancer Risk
The majority of polymorphisms affecting genes involved in carcinogen metabolism
are single nucleotide polymorphisms. Deletions are less common and the complete
absence of a gene in form of a null allele is rare. It is for this reason that the
GSTM1 and GSTT1 -/- genotypes have attracted so much attention and become the focus
of over 500 publications in molecular epidemiology. The underlying hypothesis of
these studies is that normal or increased GST enzyme activity may protect susceptible
tissues from somatic DNA mutations by facilitating the detoxification of electrophilic
carcinogens. In contrast, homozygous deletions of GSTM1 or GSTT1 are expected to
have an impaired ability to metabolically eliminate carcinogenic compounds and may
therefore place GSTM1 -/- or GSTT1 -/- individuals at increased cancer risk.
Since GSTs have overlapping substrate specificities, deficiency of an individual
GST isoenzyme may be compensated by other isoforms. Therefore, simultaneous determination
of all GST genotypes appears to be a prerequisite for reliable interpretation of
the role of the GST family in cancer development. Several molecular epidemiological
studies have examined the relation between breast cancer risk and genotypes of one,
two, or three GST subtypes [7,33]. Overall, no clear pattern has emerged. Individual
studies of one or two GSTs observed associations that were not confirmed by other
studies [34-39]. Simultaneous analysis of three GSTs did not clarify risk associations
but rather led to more contradictory results. For example, Helzlsouer et al. [40]
reported significantly increased risk for women with GSTM1 -/- and GSTT1 -/- genotypes
together with the GSTP1 (104Val/Val) genotype, whereas Mitrunen et al. [33] did not
observe any association with this genotype combination. Millikan et al. [41] found
the lowest risk for women simultaneously carrying the GSTM1 -/-, GSTT1 -/-, and GSTP1
(104Val/Val or Ile/Val) genotypes, whereas Mitrunen et al. [33] noted an increased
risk in premenopausal women lacking the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes and carrying the GSTP1
(104Ile/Ile) genotype. Yet another study of 500 breast cancer patients and 395 controls
found no increase in risk associated with any combination of GSTM1, GSTP1, and GSTT1
genotypes [42]. The different results of these studies may be attributed to differences
in the study populations and their exposure to environmental or dietary factors.
On the other hand, none of the preceding studies truly genotyped GSTM1 and GSTT1.
They only identified -/- homozygosity and thereby oversimplified the phenotype as
all or none. The positive identification of the wild-type and null alleles described
by Roodi et al. [18] for GSTM1 and by Sprenger et al. [31] for GSTT1 allowed definition
of the +/+, +/-, and -/- genotypes and unambiguous assignment of high, low, and none
conjugator phenotypes.
Application of true GSTM1 genotyping to a breast cancer case-control study revealed
that the relative risk of breast cancer for Caucasian women with the +/+ genotype
compared to women with the -/- genotype was 2.82 (95% CI 1.45 - 5.49; P = 0.002)
[18]. The association between the GSTM1 +/+ genotype and elevated breast cancer risk
was unexpected and requires an explanation, which is speculative at this time, ranging
from linkage of GSTM1 with other genes to the substrate GSH and population genetics
of the null deletion. With regard to GSH, mammalian cells have evolved protective
mechanisms such as GSH conjugation to minimize injurious events that result from
toxic chemicals and normal oxidative products of cellular metabolism. GSH depletion
to about 20 - 30% of total glutathione levels can impair the conjugation defense
against the toxic actions of such compounds and become detrimental to cellular processes
[43]. Thus, the combined conjugation activities of all GSTs may lead to GSH depletion
and thereby become counterproductive. Instead of protecting, the GSTs collectively
may expose the cell to injurious effects such as oxidative DNA damage and associated
mutagenic lesions. Alternatively, GSTs can convert several classes of compounds,
via conjugation with GSH, into cytotoxic, genotoxic, or mutagenic metabolites [44].
Although conjecture, the GSTM1 and GSTT1 +/+ genotypes may be disadvantageous under
certain circumstances, explaining the high frequency of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 -/- genotypes
in the general population. It seems that the deletion of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes
occurred not only with impunity but may actually have offered a survival advantage
for the cell.
6. Conclusions
Deletions of the GSTM1 and GSTT1 genes are common in the general population.
The expected increase in cancer risk associated with the GSTM1 and GSTT1 -/- genotypes
has not been consistently observed in over 500 epidemiological studies. However,
the genotyping was based on PCR assays that did not distinguish homozygous wild-type
+/+ and heterozygous +/- individuals. Complete GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotyping can be
accomplished by recently developed assays [18,31] that allow the definition of +/+,
+/-, and -/- genotypes by separate identification of the respective GSTM1 and GSTT1
wild-type and null alleles. Application of the new GSTM1 assay to a breast cancer
case-control study showed a significantly increased risk of breast cancer for the
+/+ genotype compared to the -/- genotype, suggesting a protective effect of the
GSTM1 deletion [18]. Regardless of the explanation underlying the association between
the +/+ genotype and increased breast cancer risk, true GSTM1 and GSTT1 genotyping
of additional or previously analyzed groups with breast cancer or other malignancies
should improve our understanding of GSTs in cancer development.
Acknowledgement
Supported in part by NIH grant 1R01CA/ES83752
References
[1] R.C. Strange, M.A. Spiteri, S. Ramachandran, A. Fryer, Glutathione-S-transferase
family of enzymes, Mutat. Res. 482 (2001) 21-26.
[2] J.D. Hayes, D.J. Pulford, The glutathione S-transferase supergene family:
Regulation of GST and the contribution of the isoenzymes to cancer chemoprotection
and drug resistance, Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 30 (1995) 445-600.
[3] B. Mannervik, Y.C. Awasthi, P.G. Board, J.D. Hayes, C. Di Ilio, B. Ketterer,
I. Listowsky, R. Morgenstern, M. Muramatsu, W.R. Pearson, C.B. Pickett, K. Sato,
M. Widerstein, C.R. Wolf, Nomenclature for human glutathione transferases, Biochem.
J. 282 (1992) 305-308.
[4] S.E. Pemble, J.B. Taylor, An evolutionary perspective on glutathione transferases
inferred from class-theta glutathione transferase cDNA sequences, Biochem. J. 287
(1992) 957-963.
[5] P.G. Board, M. Coggan, G. Chelvanayagam, S. Easteal, L.S. Jermiin, G.K. Schulte,
D.E. Danley, H. L.R., M.C. Griffor, A.V. Kamath, M.H. Rosner, B.A. Chrunyk, D.E.
Perregaux, C.A. Gabel, K.F. Geoghegan, J. Pandit, Identification, characterization
and crystal structure of the omega class glutathione transferases, J. Biol. Chem.
275 (2000) 24798-24806.
[6] T.R. Rebbeck, Molecular epidemiology of the human glutathione S-transferase
genotypes GSTM1 and GSTT1 in cancer susceptibility, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.
6 (1997) 733-743.
[7] A.M. Dunning, C.S. Healey, P.D.P. Pharoah, M.D. Teare, B.A.J. Ponder, D.F.
Easton, A systematic review of genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk, Cancer
Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 8 (1999) 843-854.
[8] S. Landi, Mammalian class theta GST and differential susceptibility to carcinogens:
a review, Mutation Res. 463 (2000) 247-283.
[9] W.R. Pearson, W.R. Vorachek, S.J. Xu, R. Berger, J. Hart, D. Vannais, D. Patterson,
Identification of class-mu glutathione transferase genes GSTM1-GSTM5 on human chromosome
1p13., Am. J. Hum. Genet. 53 (1993) 220-233.
[10] S.J. Xu, Y.P. Wang, B. Roe, W.R. Pearson, Characterization of the human class
mu glutathione S-transferase gene cluster and the GSTM1 deletion, J. Biol. Chem.
273 (1998) 3517-3527.
[11] S. Garte, L. Gaspari, A.K. Alexandrie, C. Ambrosone, H. Autrup, J.L. Aurup,
H. Baranova, L. Bathum, S. Benhamou, P. Boffetta, C. Bouchardy, K. Breskvar, J. Brockmoller,
e. al., Metabolic gene polymorphism frequencies in control populations, Cancer Epidemiol.
Biomark. Prev. 10 (2001) 1239-1248.
[12] M. Widersten, W.R. Pearson, A. Engstrom, B. Mannervik, Heterologous expression
of the allelic variant mu-class glutathione transferases mu and psi, Biochem. J.
276 (1991) 519-524.
[13] W.R. Vorachek, W.R. Pearson, G.S. Rule, Cloning, expression, and characterization
of a class-mu glutathione transferase from human muscle, the product of the GST4
locus, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88 (1991) 4443-4447.
[14] Y.V. Patskovsky, M.Q. Huang, T. Takayama, I. Listowsky, W.R. Pearson, Distinctive
structure of the human GSTM3 gene-inverted orientation relative to the mu class transferase
gene cluster, Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 361 (1999) 85-93.
[15] A. Inskip, J. Elexperu-Camiruaga, N. Buxton, P.S. Dias, J. MacIntosh, M.D.
Campbell, P.W. Jones, L. Yengi, J.A. Talbot, R.C. Strange, Identification of polymorphism
at the glutathione S-transferase, GSTM3 locus: evidence for linkage with GSTM1*A,
Biochem. J. 312 (1995) 713-716.
[16] K.E. Comstock, K.J. Johnson, D. Rifenbery, W.D. Henner, Isolation and analysis
of the gene and cDNA for human Mu class glutathione S-transferease, GSTM4, J. Biol.
Chem. 268 (1993) 16958-16965.
[17] J. Seidegard, W.R. Vorachek, R.W. Pero, W.R. Pearson, Hereditary differences
in the expression of the human glutathione transferase active on trans-stilbene oxide
are due to a gene deletion, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 85 (1988) 7293-7297.
[18] N. Roodi, W.D. Dupont, J.H. Moore, F.F. Parl, Association of homozygous wild-type
glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) genotype with increased breast cancer risk,
Cancer Res. 64 (2004) 1233-1236.
[19] T. Kano, M. Sakai, M. Muramatsu, Structure and expression of a human class
pi glutathione S-transferase messenger RNA, Cancer Res. 47 (1987) 5626-5630.
[20] I.G. Cowell, K.H. Dixon, S.E. Pemble, B. Ketterer, J.B. Taylor, The structure
of the human glutathione S-transference pi gene, Biochem. J. 255 (1988) 79-83.
[21] C.S. Morrow, K.H. Cowan, M.E. Goldsmith, Structure of the human genomic glutathione
S-transferase-pi gene, Gene 75 (1989) 3-11.
[22] M.K. Kelley, A. Engqvist-Goldstein, J.A. Montali, J.B. Wheatley, J. Schmidt,
D.E., L.M. Kauvar, Variability of glutathione S-transferase isoenzyme patterns in
matched normal and cancer human breast tissue, Biochem. J. 304 (1994) 843-848.
[23] M. Esteller, P.G. Corn, J.M. Urena, E. Gabrielson, B. S.B., J.G. Herman,
Inactivation of glutathione S-transferase P1 gene by promotor hypermethylation in
human neoplasia, Cancer Res. 58 (1998) 4515-4518.
[24] M.S. Jhaveri, C.S. Morrow, Methylation-mediated regulation of the glutathione
S-transferase P1 gene in human breast cancer cells, Gene 210 (1998) 1-7.
[25] P.G. Board, G.C. Webb, M. Coggan, Isolation of a cDNA clone and localization
of the human glutathione S-transferase 3 genes to chromosome bands 11q13 and 12q13-14,
Ann. Hum. Genet. 53 (1989) 205-213.
[26] F. Ali-Osman, O. Akande, G. Antoun, J. Mao, J. Buolamwini, Molecular cloning,
characterization, and expression in Escherichia coli of full-length cDNAs of three
human glutathione S-transferase Pi gene variants, J. Biol. Chem. 15 (1997) 10004-10012.
[27] X. Ji, J. Blaszczyk, B. Xiao, R. O'Donnell, X. Hu, C. Herzog, S.V. Singh,
P. Zimniak, Structure and function of residue 104 and water molecules in the xenobiotic
substrate-binding site in human glutathione S-transferase P1-1, Biochemistry 38 (1999)
10231-10238.
[28] M. Coggan, L. Whitbread, A. Whittington, P. Board, Structure and organization
of the human theta-class glutathione S-transferase and D-dopachrome tautomerase gene
complex, Biochem. J. 334 (1998) 617-623.
[29] A. Whittington, V. Vichai , G. Webb, R. Baker, W. Pearson, P. Board, Gene
structure, expression and chromosomal localization of murine theta class glutathione
transferase mGSTT1-1, Biochem. J. 337 (1999) 141-151.
[30] H.H. Nelson, J.K. Wiencke, D.C. Christiani, T.J. Cheng, Z.F. Zuo, B.S. Schwartz,
B.K. Lee, M.R. Spitz, M. Wang, X. Xu, Ethnic differences in the prevalence of the
homozygous deleted genotype of glutathione S-transferase theta, Carcinogenesis 16
(1995) 1243-1245.
[31] R. Sprenger, R. Schlagenhaufer, R. Kerb, C. Bruhn, J. Brockmoller, T. Roots,
U. Brinkmann, Characterization of the glutathione S-transferase GSTT1 deletion: discrimination
of all genotypes by polymerase chain reaction indicates a trimodular genotype-phenotype
correlation., Pharmacogenetics (2000) 557-565.
[32] S. Pemble, K.R. Schroeder, S.R. Spencer, D.J. Meyer, E. Hallier, H.M. Bolt,
K. B., J.B. Taylor, Human glutathione S-transferase theta (GSTT1): cDNA cloning and
the characterization of a genetic polymorphism, Biochem. J. 300 (1994) 271-276.
[33] K. Mitrunen, N. Jourenkova, V. Kataja, M. Eskelinen, V.M. Kosma, S. Benhamou,
H. Vainio, M. Uusitupa, A. Hirvonen, Glutathione S-transferase M1, M3, P1, and T1
genetic polymorphisms and susceptibility to breast cancer, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark.
Prev. 10 (2001) 229-236.
[34] C.B. Ambrosone, J.L. Freudenheim, S. Graham, J.R. Marshall, J.E. Vena, J.R.
Brasure, R. Laughlin, T. Nemoto, A.M. Michalek, A. Harrington, T.D. Ford, P.G. Shields,
Cytochrome P4501A1 and glutathione S-transferase (M1) genetic polymorphisms and postmenopausal
breast cancer risk, Cancer Res. 55 (1995) 3483- 3485.
[35] K.T. Kelsey, S.E. Hankinson, G.A. Colditz, K. Springer, M. Garcia-Closas,
D. Spiegelman, J.E. Manson, M. Garland, M.J. Stampfer, W.C. Willett, F.E. Speizer,
D.J. Hunter, Glutathione S-transferase class m deletion polymorphism and breast
cancer: Results from prevalent versus incident cases, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark.
Prev. 6 (1997) 511-515.
[36] L.R. Bailey, N. Roodi, C.S. Verrier, C.J. Yee, W.D. Dupont, F.F. Parl, Breast
cancer and CYP1A1, GSTM1, and GSTT1 polymorphisms: Evidence of a lack of association
in Caucasians and African Americans, Cancer Res. 58 (1998) 65-70.
[37] S.S. Coughlin, M. Piper, Genetic polymorphisms and risk of breast cancer,
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 8 (1999) 1023-1032.
[38] M. Garcia-Closas, K.T. Kelsey, S.E. Hankinson, D. Spiegelman, K. Springer,
W.C. Willett, F.E. Speizer, D.J. Hunter, Glutathione S-transferase mu and theta polymorphisms
and breast cancer susceptibility, J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 91 (1999) 1960-1964.
[39] M. Zhao, R. Lewis, D.R. Gustafson, W.Q. Wen, J.R. Cerhan, W. Zheng, No apparent
association of GSTP1 A313 G polymorphism with breast cancer risk among postmenopausal
Iowa women, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 10 (2001) 1301-1302.
[40] K.J. Helzlsouer, O. Selmin, H. Huang, P.T. Strickland, S. Hoffman, A.J. Alberg,
M. Watson, G.W. Comstock, D. Bell, Association between glutathione S-transferase
M1, P1, and T1 genetic polymorphisms and development of breast cancer, J. Natl. Cancer
Inst. 90 (1998) 512-518.
[41] R. Millikan, G. Pittman, C.K. Tse, D.A. Savitz, B. Newman, D. Bell, Glutathione
S-transferases M1, T1 and P1 and breast cancer, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev.
9 (2000) 567-573.
[42] K. Gudmundsdottir, L. Tryggvadottir, J.E. Eyfjord, GSTM1, GSTTI, and GSTP1
genotypes in relation to breast cancer risk and frequency of mutations in the p53
gene, Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 10 (2001) 1169-1173.
[43] D.J. Reed, Glutathione: toxicological implications, Annu. Rev. Pharmacol.
Toxicol. 30 (1990) 603-631.
[44] T.J. Monks, M.W. Anders, W. Dekant, J.L. Stevens, S.S. Lau, P.J. van Bladeren,
Glutathione conjugate mediated toxicities, Toxicol. Applied Pharmacol. 106 (1990)
1-19.
Back . . .